Passive vs Active: What Made Me More in 12 Months
- Felix La Spina
- Aug 12
- 3 min read
Everyone debates it.
“Passive always wins!” “You have to be active in today’s market!” “Nobody beats the S&P 500.” “Why pay for an index fund when you can buy the winners?”
I didn’t want opinions. I wanted data.
So I ran an experiment: Two portfolios. Same amount of money. Same starting point. One built with a passive, ETF-only approach. One built with active, hand-picked stocks.

Then I tracked both for 12 months.
🟥 The Setup: Passive vs Active Portfolio Rules
I didn’t use margin or options. I didn’t short anything. This was meant to simulate a real beginner trying both paths.
🟨 Portfolio #1: The Passive Approach
I modeled this after what most ETF-focused investors would build, especially someone using a robo-advisor or starting with StockEducation.com’s simulator.
Initial Allocation:
VTI (Total market): $2,000
SCHD(Dividend ETF): $1,000
VOO (S&P 500): $1,000
XLV (Healthcare ETF): $500
CASH (HYSA): $500 (dry powder)
I made no changes other than:
Rebalancing once at the 6-month mark
Reinvesting dividends (DRIP turned on)
This portfolio required almost no attention. I logged in once a month to check performance, nothing more.
📈 Portfolio #2: The Active Approach
This portfolio was built the way most people invest after watching YouTube or getting caught in FOMO cycles.
Initial Picks:
I adjusted positions monthly based on:
News
Earnings
Sentiment shifts
“Tips” from friends and influencers
😅 Emotional Differences Between the Two
What shocked me most wasn’t the returns (yet). It was how I felt managing each one.
I started to realize: The passive portfolio made me feel calm. The active portfolio made me feel busy — but not smarter.
📊 Final Results: What Actually Made Me More
At the end of 12 months, I ran the numbers.
🟢 Passive Portfolio Wins
It wasn’t even close.
Despite holding popular names like TSLA, PLTR, and NVDA in the active portfolio, I:
Bought too high
Sold too early
Underestimated fees and emotional swings
The passive portfolio just… worked.
And it did so with less effort, more income, and fewer headaches.

🧠 Why the Passive Portfolio Performed Better
Here’s what made the difference:
1. Rebalancing Once Beat Overtrading
The passive portfolio rebalanced once — at the 6-month mark.
The active portfolio “rebalanced” monthly — usually in response to fear, hype, or frustration.
That killed gains and compounded poor decisions.
2. ETFs Smoothed Out Mistakes
Every ETF held dozens — if not hundreds — of companies.
If one underperformed, another made up for it.
Meanwhile, one bad active pick dragged down the entire month.
3. Time Spent ≠ Better Results
I spent 3x more time on the active portfolio and made 50% less.
That’s when I realized:
Time spent on your portfolio isn’t what matters — how it’s built does.
💬 Emotional Closure: I Wasn’t Smarter, Just Quieter
The biggest gain wasn’t financial — it was mental.
I didn’t flinch when the passive portfolio dipped. I flinched constantly watching my active holdings.
And when I finally compared both, I didn’t feel bad. I felt relieved.
Because now I had proof: I didn’t need to chase gains to build real growth.
🧪 What I’d Tell Anyone Debating Passive vs Active
Here’s my honest advice after doing both:
🔵 Want to Build a Beginner Portfolio That Works?
Here’s how I’d start if I were doing this from scratch again:
✅ Step 1: Take the Free Quiz
👉 VisitStockEducation.com
It will help you build:
A portfolio aligned to your personality
Diversification by design
Realistic return expectations
An investing habit that doesn’t require checking every day
✅ Step 2: Use the Tools That Made Passive Work
Here’s what helped me stay grounded:
Portfolio simulator
Risk balance tracker
Backtest engine for “how this would’ve done over 5+ years”
Passive doesn’t mean passive learning. These tools helped me understand what I was building.
✅ Step 3: Stop Overthinking It
This is the lesson that sticks:
The simpler portfolio made me more — and I barely touched it.
I didn’t chase tips. I didn’t time the market. I didn’t even try that hard.
And I still outperformed myself.



Comments